Assessment of mid-way review Assessment at the mid-way review in Sport Science Part of our University’s mission is to conduct high-quality research and offer high-quality doctoral programmes. To ensure quality, the thesis and dissertation projects underway shall be reviewed by means of individual supervision, research teams and designated review seminars. The primary responsibility for this review falls on the supervisors and the research teams, however, it is important that follow-up of thesis projects is also carried out in a wider circle. The seminar discussion of research plans, mid-way and final manuscripts shall primarily offer the doctoral student support as they continue their projects, however, the seminars should also be viewed as a means for the University and subjects to review the quality of the doctoral student’s work on a continuous basis. At these reviews, the quality of the research shall be reviewed, but also the work in relation to the objectives for and intended outcomes of the doctoral programme as detailed in the general syllabus for the subject. The seminar opens with the doctoral student giving a brief presentation of their project. This is followed by a discussion, primarily involving the experts, thereafter with the whole audience. The seminar concludes with a separate discussion with the doctoral student. Date Doctoral student Swedish personal identity number Subject area and specialisation Principal supervisor/Chair of seminar Experts Expert; name and University Expert; name and University Experts’ overall assessment Select one option: In relation to the objectives and intended outcomes for the doctoral programme, our assessment is that this work has the necessary qualities to lead to a doctoral degree after minor alterations as detailed below. In relation to the objectives and intended outcomes for the doctoral programme, our assessment is that this work has shortcomings and requires extensive alterations as detailed below. As a result of this the principal supervisor shall contact the head of subject. Experts' feedback It is important to note the most important advice below, not just refer to "oral advice" or "discussions at the seminar". Write the most important advise here. The advice can apply, for example, to activity, progress and quality in the research project, the development in the doctoral student's learning in relation to the learning outcomes for the intended degree or the doctoral student's development towards independence. Do the existing ethical permissions cover the planned and completed projects? Comments and possible recommendations. Document checklist Confirm if ethical permissions and Ladok extracts have been checked: Ethical permissions have been checked LADOK extracts have been checked Current Individual studyplan has been checked by an administrator Signature Select one option for signatures: Both experts are physically present and can sign. Send assessment to chair of seminar for printing. One expert is physically present and the other participates digitally. Send assessment to both chair of seminar and expert. Both experts participate digitally. Send assessment documents to them for signing. Chair of seminar's e-mail address E-mail address of expert E-mail address of expert Send
