Katalin Kelemen

Artiklar i tidskrifter

• Kelemen, K. & Giaretta, A. (2026). Chat Control e disallineamento tra diritto europeo e legislazione italiana sull’adescamento di minori.  Questione Giustizia (3), 302-310. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. , Dahlberg, M. , Elmerot, Å. , Fogde, M. K. , Karlsson, H. L. , Krunke, H. , Nadim, M. & Pettersson, N. (2026). Constitutional reasoning in the Nordic supreme courts: A comparative empirical analysis.  International Journal of Constitutional Law. [BibTeX]
• Dahlberg, M. & Kelemen, K. (2025). Constitutional law in the Finnish Supreme Courts: The role of preparatory works and precedents in constitutional interpretation.  Retfærd: Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift (1), 27-43. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Valguarnera, F. (2025). Legal Pragmatism: A Comparison with the Nordic Legal Method.  The Italian law journal, 11 (1), 239-264. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & de Miranda, L. (2024). Courts as Anthrobots: Learning from Human Forms of Interaction to Develop a Philosophically Healthy Model for Judicial Automation.  International Journal for Court Administration, 15 (2). [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2023). Una breve nota sull’impatto della sentenza Dobbsin Ungheria: [A brief note on the impact of the Dobbs decision in Hungary].  BioLaw journal / Rivista di biodiritto (1S), 483-488. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). Dissenting opinions: A comparative perspective.  Richterzeitung "Justice – Justiz – Giustizia" (4). [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). Különvélemények a magyar Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában (1990–2010).  Közjogi Szemle (2), 24-36. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). Erményi v. Hungary: The European Court of Human Rights expands the notion of privacy.  Quaderni Costituzionali, 37 (1), 185-190. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the concept of national constitutional identity.  Ianus - Diritto e finanza (15-16), 23-33. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe.  Review of Central and Eastern European Law, 42 (1), 1-49. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). Baka contro Ungheria: La Corte EDU e l’indipendenza dei giudici.  Quaderni Costituzionali, 36 (4), 827-830. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). Introduction: The 4th Comparative Law Workshop (Örebro, 16 October 2015).  Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 57 (3), 322-323. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2014). L'accesso individuale indiretto alla Corte costituzionale ungherese.  Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo (1), 432-446. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). Appointment of Constitutional Judges in a Comparative Perspective – with a Proposal for a New Model for Hungary.  Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54 (1), 5-23. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). Dissenting opinions in constitutional courts.  German Law Journal, 14 (8), 1345-1371. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Fekete, B. (2013). Introduction: The First Hungarian-Italian Comparative Law Workshop (Budapest, 11 June 2012).  Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54 (1), 1-3. [BibTeX]
• Johansson, M. C. & Kelemen, K. (2013). Still neglecting the demand that fuels human trafficking: a study comparing the criminal laws and practice of five european states on human trafficking, purchasing sex from trafficked adults and from minors.  European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 21 (3-4), 247-289. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Az alkotmánybírák választása Európában és hazánkban.  Új Magyar Közigazgatás, 4 (4), 2-14. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Hungary is drafting a new Constitution.  Diritii Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Una nuova Costituzione per l'Ungheria.  Quaderni Costituzionali (3), 681-683. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Van még pálya: a magyar Alkotmánybíróság hatáskörében bekövetkezett változásokról.  Fundamentum, 4, 87-96. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2010). Comparazione giuridica ed Europa dell’est.  Rivista di diritto civile, 56 (6), 861-876. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2008). A bírói különvélemény története a nyugati jogrendszerekben.  Jogtudományi Közlöny, 63 (9), 413-425. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2008). La Corte costituzionale ungherese e la tutela delle minoranze nazionali ed etniche.  Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo (2), 630-646. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2007). A Magyar Köztársaság Alkotmánybírósága és a nemzeti és etnikai kisebbségek jogainak védelme: az Alkotmánybíróság 2005-ben hozott hat határozata kapcsán.  Esély társadalom – és szociálpolitikai folyóirat (1), 24-46. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2004). Bevándorlók és szervezett bűnözés Olaszország és Kelet-Közép-Európa viszonyában, különös tekintettel Magyarországra, Lengyelországra és Csehországra.  Ügyészek Lapja (5), 53-66. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2003). A szervezett bűnözés az olasz jogban.  Ügyészek Lapja (5), 5-32. [BibTeX]

Artiklar, forskningsöversikter

• Kelemen, K. (2019). Constitutional reasoning: a flourishing field of research in comparative law.  International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (4), 1336-1344. [BibTeX]

Artiklar, recensioner

• Kelemen, K. (2025). Vörös Imre válogatott különvéleményeinek gyűjteményéről.  Jogtudományi Közlöny (10), 479-481. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2019). Review of: S. Cocchi, Uguali nella sostanza, differenti per territorio? La tutela costituzionale dei diritti sociali in Italia e in Spagna.  Állam- és Jogtudomány, 60 (1), 117-120. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). Review of: Maria Pia Baccari Vari (ed), I fondamenti del diritto europeo e la nuova Costituzione ungherese (Modena: Mucchi Editore 2014).  Állam- és Jogtudomány (3), 162-165. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2008). Review of: A. Jakab–P. Takács–A.F. Tatham (eds.), The Transformation of the Hungarian Legal Order 1985–2005 (Alphen aan den Rihn: Kluwer Law International 2007).  Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 68 (3), 894-897. [BibTeX]

Böcker

• Kelemen, K. (2018). Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts: A Comparative and Legal Perspective. Oxford: Routledge. [BibTeX]

Kapitel i böcker, del av antologier

• Kelemen, K. & Pettersson, N. (2026). About the Methodology: A Quantitative Approach to Comparing Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. I: Katalin Kelemen, Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts: An Empirical and Comparative Legal Perspective (ss. 23-50). London: Hart Publishing Ltd. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2026). Conclusions: Is there a Nordic Constitutional Culture?. I: Katalin Kelemen, Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts: An Empirical and Comparative Legal Perspective (ss. 185-207). London: Hart Publishing Ltd. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. , Dahlberg, M. , Elmerot, Å. , Fogde, M. K. , Karlsson, H. L. , Krunke, H. , Nadim, M. & Pettersson, N. (2026). Exploring Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts Empirically: An Introduction. I: Katalin Kelemen, Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts: An Empirical and Comparative Legal Perspective (ss. 1-22). London: Hart Publishing Ltd. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2024). Dissents and Other Separate Opinions. I: Lee Epstein; Gunnar Grendstad; Urška Šadl; Keren Weinshall, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour (ss. 545-563). . Oxford University Press. [BibTeX]
• Dahlberg, M. , Karlsson, H. L. & Kelemen, K. (2024). The Nordic courts: An example of cooperation and dialogue. I: Kálmán Pócza, Constitutional Review in Western Europe: Judicial-Legislative Relations in Comparative Perspective (ss. 288-312). . Routledge. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2021). Legal reasoning in Central and Eastern Europe from a historical perspective. I: Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt; Andreas Moberg; Joakim Nergelius, Rule of Law in the EU: 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall (ss. 109-144). Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2020). Dissenting opinions in ordinary courts: A civil law perspective. I: Vittoria Barsotti and Alessandro Simoni, Processo e cultura giuridica: Procedure and legal culture (Scritti per gli 80 anni di Vincenzo Varano) (ss. 59-78). Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2019). Should judges reveal their disagreement in a case?: The ambiguous relationship between dissenting opinions and judicial independence. I: Cristina Trenta, Juridicum Anthology 2019 (ss. 111-121). Örebro: Örebro university. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). I sistemi giuridici dell'Europa orientale. I: Vincenzo Varano, Vittoria Barsotti, La tradizione giuridica occidentale: Testi e materiali per un confronto civil law common law (ss. 182-201). Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Fekete, B. (2016). How Should the Legal Systems of Eastern Europe Be Classified Today?. I: Josef Zila, Juridicums Årsbok: 2014-2015 (ss. 135-161). Örebro: Örebro universitet. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2014). Dissenting opinions in constitutional courts. I: Catharina Calleman, Juridicums Årsbok 2011-2013 (ss. 201-227). Örebro: Örebro University. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). Access to Constitutional Justice in the New Hungarian Constitutional Framework: Life after the Actio Popularis?. I: Antonia Geisler, Michael Hein and Siri Hummel, Law, Politics, and the Constitution: New Perspectives from Legal and Political Theory (ss. 63-78). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang Publishing Group. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). La Corte costituzionale. I: Giuseppe Franco Ferrari, La nuova Legge Fondamentale ungherese (ss. 87-100). Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). La storia costituzionale ungherese. I: Giuseppe Franco Ferrari, La nuova Legge Fondamentale ungherese (ss. 1-12). Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. [BibTeX]

Konferensbidrag

• Kelemen, K. (2019). Dissenting opinions in the civil law tradition: Trends and challenges. Konferensbidrag vid Workshop on Judicial Decision-Making, Faculty of Law and City Court, Bergen, Norway, May 8, 2019. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2019). Legal argumentation and interpretation in Central and Eastern Europe from a historical perspective. Konferensbidrag vid Swedish Network for European Legal Studies: 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall: Rule of Law in the European Union, Hasselbacken, Stockholm, Sweden, November 14-15, 2019. Stockholm: [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). Il principio di indipendenza e le opinioni dissenzienti: Un rapporto ambiguo. Konferensbidrag vid Annual conference of "Diritti Comparati", entitled "L'indipendenza delle corti nel diritto costituzionale, comparato ed europeo", Università Bocconi, Milano, Italy, October 18-19, 2018. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). Judicial dissent and the civil law tradition. Konferensbidrag vid XXIV Bi-annual Colloquium of the Italian Association of Comparative Law (AIDC), Università Suor Orsola Benincasa, Naples, Italy, June 15-17, 2017. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). Judicial dissent in constitutional courts. Konferensbidrag vid ICON-S Conference ‘Courts, Power, Public Law’, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 5-7, 2017. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). Reflections on the path dependence of the law and its utility for comparativists. Konferensbidrag vid Workshop "New Paths in Comparative Law", at Università degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di diritto privato e storia del diritto, Milano, Italy, April 5, 2017. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). Judicial dissent and legal certainty. Konferensbidrag vid 8th Central and Eastern European Forum for Young Legal, Political and Social Theorists, Budapest, Hungary, April 22-23, 2016. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). Reflections on the path dependency of legal systems and contextuality. Konferensbidrag vid Workshop "Objectives, Methods and Perspectives of a Contextual Analysis in Comparative Law", Institute for Legal Studies, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Social Sciences (MTA TK JTI), Budapest, May 19, 2016. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2015). Dissenting Opinions in European Constitutional Courts: Authoritativeness vs. Transparency. Konferensbidrag vid ICON-S Annual Conference on "Public Law in an Uncertain World" of the International Society of Public Law (ICON), New York, USA, July 1-3, 2015. [BibTeX]
• Cordelli, C. & Kelemen, K. (2015). Examination methods in comparative law: the Swedish experience. Konferensbidrag vid XXIII Bi-Annual Colloquium of the Italian Association of Comparative Law (AIDC), Palermo, Italy, June 11-13, 2015. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Fekete, B. (2014). How Should the Legal Systems of Eastern Europe Be Classified Today?. I: A. Badó, D.W. Belling, J. Bóka and P. Mezei,  International Conference for the 10th Anniversary of the Institute of Comparative Law of the University of Szeged. Konferensbidrag vid International Conference for the 10th Anniversary of the Institute of Comparative Law, Szeged, Hungary, 24 May, 2013. (ss. 197-223). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). Some reflections on the comparative method: When a comparativist looks at her own legal system. Konferensbidrag vid Second Hungarian-Italian Comparative Law Workshop, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, September 20, 2013. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). The Access to Constitutional Justice in the New Hungarian Constitutional Framework. Konferensbidrag vid 5th Central and Eastern European Forum of Young Legal, Political and Social Theorists, Alfried Krupp Wissenschaftskolleg, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, May 3–4, 2013. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). Az alkotmánybírák hivatalviselési ideje és újraválasztása. I: Drinóczi Tímea, Jakab András,  Alkotmányozás Magyarországon 2010–2011 Vol. II. Konferensbidrag vid Conference on the new Hungarian Constitution, Péter Pázmány Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary, February 4, 2011. (ss. 241-270). Pécs: Pázmány Press. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). The Hungarian Constitutional Court in the new constitutional framework. Konferensbidrag vid III Colloquio biennale dei giovani comparatisti, organised by the Italian Association of Comparative Law, Aosta, Italy, June 28-29, 2012. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Dissenting opinions in the practice of the constitutional courts of East-Central Europe: with particular reference to the Hungarian Constitutional Court. Konferensbidrag vid International Conference "Advocates or Notaries of Democracy? A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis of the Role of Constitutional Courts in Political Transformation Processes", Berlin Graduate School of Social Sciences, Berlin, Germany, September 22–24, 2011. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Fekete, B. (2011). The classification of Eastern European legal systems: new approaches to the understanding of former Socialist legal systems. Konferensbidrag vid XXI Colloquio biennale dell’Associazione Italiana di Diritto Comparato, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Italy, June 9–11, 2011. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). The New Hungarian Constitution: European Criticalities. Konferensbidrag vid Winter Trento European Seminar on the New Constitution of Hungary, Trento, Italy, December 15-16, 2011. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). The road from common law to East-Central Europe: the case of the dissenting opinion. I: Péter Cserne, Miklós Könczöl,  Legal and Political Theory in the Post-National Age Selected papers presented at the Second Central and Eastern European Forum for Legal, Political and Social Theorists (Budapest, 21-22 May 2010). Konferensbidrag vid The Second Central and Eastern European Forum for Legal, Political and Social Theorists (Budapest, 21-22 May 2010). (ss. 118-134). Peter Lang Publishing Group. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Tutela giuridica della minoranza rom nell’ordinamento giuridico ungherese. I: Paolo Bonetti, Alessandro Simoni, Tommaso Vitale,  La condizione giuridica di rom e sinti in Italia Tomo I. Konferensbidrag vid Condizione giuridica di Rom e Sinti in Italia, Atti del Convegno iternazionale. Milano,16-18 giugno 2010. (ss. 477-504). Milano: Giuffre. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2007). The Use of Dissenting Opinions by Constitutional Courts of East-Central Europe. Konferensbidrag vid Workshop "Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe: An Overview and Perspectives", University of Trento, Trento, Italy, October 10-11, 2007. [BibTeX]

Rapporter

• Pettersson, N. & Kelemen, K. (2024). Yet another case of Nordic exceptionalism? A quantitative approach to an intra-Nordic and an international comparison of supreme courts’ constitutional reasoning. Örebro: Örebro University School of Business (Working Papers, School of Business 2024:7). [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2016). The decision-making process of European constitutional courts: A comparative perspective.. Diritti Comparati (Diritti comparati. Working papers 2). [BibTeX]

Samlingsverk (redaktör)

• Kelemen, K. (ed.) (2026). Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts: An Empirical and Comparative Legal Perspective. London: Hart Publishing Ltd (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law ). [BibTeX]

Övrigt

• Kelemen, K. (2026). Quo vadis, Corte costituzionale ungherese? Gli scenari dopo le elezioni del 12 aprile. (Blog Diritti Comparati) [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2026). Ripristinare lo Stato di diritto senza tradirne i principi: il caso della Corte costituzionale ungherese. (Blog Diritti Comparati) [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2021). The Facebook Oversight Board: Some thoughts on transparency. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. & Steuer, M. (2019). Constitutional Court of Hungary (Magyarország Alkotmánybírósága). [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2019). La dignità umana delle persone senza fissa dimora: Secondo la Corte costituzionale ungherese non esiste un diritto di rifiutare l’aiuto offerto dallo stato. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). A common law jogrendszerek. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2018). The Agreement on a Unified Patent Court cannot be ratified by Hungary, the Constitutional Court says. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). Book Review: Katalin Kelemen on András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre & Giulio Itzcovich’s “Comparative Constitutional Reasoning”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2017). The Hungarian Constitutional Court enters the dialogue on national constitutional identity. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2015). EU court strikes down the language regime of EPSO’s recruitment process. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2015). Opinion 2/13 of the CJEU: Whose opinion?. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). A Flexible Constitution: The 4th Amendment to the Hungarian Fundamental Law – Part I. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). A Flexible Constitution: The 4th Amendment to the Hungarian Fundamental Law – Part II. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2013). Hungary: voter registration declared unconstitutional. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). Hungary: The Constitutional Court annulled some provisions of the media laws. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). The final blow to the Hungarian law lowering judges’ retirement age struck by the European Court of Justice. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). The Venice Commission on the new Hungarian Constitutional Court Act. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2012). The Venice Commission’s Opinion on the independence of the Hungarian judiciary. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Cinque nuovi giudici alla Corte costituzionale ungherese. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Constitution-making in Hungary: the final stage. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Hungary: the new Constitutional Court Act. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Nuova Costituzione ungherese adottata e promulgata. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). The new Hungarian Constitution and Europe. Diritti Comparati. [BibTeX]
• Kelemen, K. (2011). Ungheria: Primi appunti sull'adozione della nuova Costituzione. Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali. [BibTeX]